A comprehensive complaint on Hovhakimyan’s case was sent to the European Court of Human Rights


European Court of Human Rights

The case of Stepan Hovhakimyan who is charged with burglary in the Cinema Moscow and is kept in detention for almost 28 months, is sent to the European Court of Human Rights.

Let us remind that Stepan Hovhakimyan and Vahram Kerobyan are charged for theft of 5 million 80 thousand Armenian drams and 10000 Russian rubles. They are detained for more than two years, and their case is investigated by the Court of First Instance of Kentron and Nork Marash administrative districts chaired by Judge Mkhitar Papoyan.

The detention was based on a testimony of Hovhakimyan, who asserts that the testimony was obtained through torture. His lawyer mentions that no proper investigation was conducted regarding Hovhakimyan’s declaration on cruel treatment.

The complaint on Hovhakimyan’s case was sent to the European Court of Human Rights about violation of the Articles 3, 5, 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

“The basis of the complaint is violation of the Art.3 of the Convention on cruel treatment aimed at obtaining testimony, and on absence of effective investigation of complaints about cruel treatment,” said the lawyer to the

The complaint refers also to Article 5 of the Convention: p.1- regarding violation related to detention in absence of legal basis, p.3 - regarding unlawfully long detention, p.4-regarding absence of opportunity to appeal the lawfulness of detention during court investigation.

“We also mentioned that according to the Art.6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, there was a violation regarding “equal forces” principle during the court hearings on the complaint against the decision of the Special Investigative Service, which declined the appeal on ungrounded long detention during criminal investigation and the appeal to open a criminal case on torture,” says lawyer Safaryan.

The European Court of Human Rights also qualifies as violation the absence of effective legal defense in case of ungrounded long investigation, which is stated in the Art.13 of the Convention. The lawyer’scomplaint also referred to this Article.

As Tigran Safaryan informed, the complaint to the European Court of Human Rights was sent on 28 May, and the response is expected not earlier than one year.

Let us mention that the U.S. State Department 2011 Report on Human Rights also outlined the case of Stepan Hovhakimyan and Vahram Kerobyan.

Also, today on 30 May, at 16:30, the next court hearing on the case will take place at the Kentron and Nork Marash First Instance Court.  

Author Կարինե Իոնեսյան