Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Qerobyan

Case description

Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Qerobyan are charged for organizing and committing a theft from «Moscow» cinema house on January 10th, 2010 based on the Article 38(3) and Article 177. 3(1) of the RA Criminal Code, They are under preliminary detention for more than two years. The criminal case is under the proceeding of the Court of First Instance of Kentron and Nork Marsah Administrative districts chaired by the judge Mkhitar Papoyan. The guys are charged for theft of 5 million 80 000 AMD and 10 000 RR.

On 6 February 2010, Hovakimyan was charged with violations of Article 177(3)(1) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia and detained after spending 72 hours in police custody. To this day Hovakimyan and Kerobyan (also later arrested) remain in detention at Nubarashen penitentiary institution. Their trials continue to be unduly delayed and no independent and fair investigation has yet been conducted. Despite two years to further corroborate the charges in his case, the principal evidence against Hovakimyan remains a confession statement obtained by police using duress and psychological violence on 6 February 2010. 

Hovakimyan had already attended Yerevan police station on 11 and 14 January 2010, where he remained in custody for over 10 hours and was allegedly subjected to violent treatment, before being released without confessing. 

On 6 February 2010 Stepan Hovakimyan again attended Yerevan police department where he was subjected to torture and inhumane and degrading treatment. In the course of this treatment Hovakimyan was beaten on the head, undressed, had his shoes removed and the soles of his feet beaten with a rubber baton until he confessed to theft. He claims to have been invited to the Yerevan police department on that occasion without a proper summons and before any complaint had been lodged by the victim or criminal proceedings instituted. Only after signing the confession statement was S. Hovakimyan permitted to inform his relatives of his custody, and given access to a lawyer for the first time. 

Having been implicated in conniving in the theft in S. Hovakimyan's confession statement, V. Kerobyan was arrested on 12 March 2010. He remains detained and charged with theft to date. 

Hovakimyan's complaint concerning torture on 6 February 2010, lodged with the Special Investigation Service (SIS), proved unsuccessful. SIS decided not to institute criminal proceedings against those responsible, relying instead on the police officers' explanations of events and declining to investigate the torture allegations further. This decision was appealed in the Court of General Jurisdiction of the Kentron and Nork-Marash districts, but rejected on 2 August 2011. A subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeals culminated in the first instance judgment being upheld on 26 December 2011 - a ruling is currently lodged for appeal before the Court of Cassation. The court returned the appeal.   

  • The court uphold the decision on detention

    28.03.2012 | Point of View
    The judge Mkhitar Papoyan rejected the petition of advocates for the second time to release Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Qerobyan mentioning they are accused of a grave crime. He did not take into account the fact that the grounds on which the two men were arrested 2 years ago are not relevant today. The relatives were ready to give a bail, Hovakimyan’s father was ready to put the only real estate they have their apartment in pledge. The court did not take into account the petition of more than 20 intellectuals by which they ensure Stepan Hovakimyan’s proper behavior. The court made a decision to uphold the decision on arrest taking as a principle the degree of danger of the crime.

  • A criminal case with a whole “bunch” of human rights violations

    26.03.2012 | Point of View
    Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Qerobyan, who were charged for theft from “Moscow” cinema, are under detention for more than 2 years. There is no evidence proving their guilt. The only ground is the confession of Stepan Hovakimyan, which he claims to have written because of battery and torture. On March 26 “Civil Society Institute” (CSI) NGO held a press conference demanding to change the preventive measures of Hovakimyan and Qerobyan and to conduct a comprehensive and unbiased investigation on the fact of torture of Hovakimyan.

  • FIDH and the Civil Society Institute Demand Fair Trial in the Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahrma Qerobyan Case

    23.02.2012 | News
    Two years have passed since Stepan Hovakimyan was charged on 6 February 2010 with organizing and committing theft at the "Moskva" cinema house on 10 January 2010. FIDH and the Civil Society Institute call upon the Armenian authorities to: immediately release S.Hovakimyan and V. Kerobyan on bail; conduct an independent, effective and thorough investigation into the torture allegations to identify the perpetrators and bring them to justice.

  • The fact of torture of Hovakimyan will be proved by the witnesses

    15.12.2011 | News
    For proving the fact that Stepan Hovakimyan was subjected to torture, witnesses will be interrogated. After suspending the trials for this case for several times the RA Court of Criminal Appeals satisfied the lawyer’s motion to interrogate the witnesses during the next court trial, who prove that the fact of torture took place.

  • Judge Khandanyan kept the letter ''secret'' from the prosecutor’s office for some time

    02.09.2011 | News
    Tigran Safaryan, Stepan Hovakimyan's attorney, applied to the Court of Appeals appealing against the decision of the Yerevan Kentron and Nork-Marash administrative regions general jurisdiction court of August 2, 2011 that rejected the claim arguing that the Special Investigation Service had conducted proper investigation and the claim is not grounded.

  • Civil Society Institute Calls for Investigation in Torture Announcements

    17.05.2011 | News
    It is already more than a year that Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Kerobyan are under arrest. They have been charged with organizing and committing larceny at the "Moskva" cinema house on January 10, 2010 (Article 38, part 3 and Article 177, part 5, point 1 of the RA Criminal Code).

  • No Criminal Case Was Instituted On The Fact of Torture

    17.05.2011 | Point of View
    Today Civil Society Institute called upon the authorities to conduct a fair trial of Stepan Hovakimyan's and Vahram Qerobyan's case, avoid using evidences obtained by violence and stop the vicious practice of using solely self-confessions as a basis of case investigation.

  • The Court Hearing of the Case of Moscow Cinema Restarted

    24.03.2011 | Point of View
    On March 23, the hearing of Stepan Hovakimyan's and Vahram Qerobyan's case restarted in the General Jurisdiction Court of Kentron and Nork Marash administrative districts presided by the Judge Mkhitar Papoyan.

  • Next