Torture

Situation in Armenia

Armenia has joined the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in 1993. The high contracted parties should report the Committee against Torture on the taken measures in regard of the obligations taken under the convention. Article 119 of the RA Criminal Code defines torture, which is not in compliance with Article 1 of the UN Convention.

RA Criminal Code defines torture as a crime of medium gravity without specifying the subjects, i.e. without mentioning that pain or suffering should be inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.

The article does not either define the purpose of causing a person pain or suffering, i.e. for obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind[1].

The elements of torture given in Article 1 of the Convention are reflected in Article 341 (Forcing testimony by the judge, by the prosecutor, by the investigator or by the person in charge of inquiry) of the RA Criminal Code. RA Criminal Code criminalizes forcing a person to make a false testimony, conclusion or translation, committed at judicial proceedings as means of torture, excluding cases of this kind committed by officials or with their support in other places, for instance at rallies (between a police officer and a participant), penitentiaries, military forces, etc[2].

Cases of torture are not revealed very often, as victims rarely raise the issue being frightened that the consequences could be even worse.

Levon Ghulyan's death at the police made immense public resonance. He was summoned to the police as a witness on the 12th of May, 2007. No one is held liable for his death until now. RA Special Investigation Service, based on the decision dated 21 of March 2011, did not comply with the requirements of the RA Court of Cassation decision from 27.10.210 and terminated the criminal case in regard of Levon Gulyan's death for the third time without making any investigation.

On the 13th of April 24 year-old Vahan Khalafyan died at Charentsavan Police Station. On 29th of November, 2010, First Instance Court of Kotayk region sentenced Ashot Hatutyunyan, the ex-head of Criminal Investigations Division of the Charentsavan police to eight years of imprisonment for abuse of power.

Movses Hayrapetyan, a policeman of the Criminal Investigations Division, was sentenced to two years of conditional imprisonment, while Gagik Davtyan and Garik Ghazaryan were found not guilty. Human rights defenders and the relatives of the deceased claim that Khalafyan was killed. At present the case is appealed.

Stepan Hovakimyan, who is charged with the organization and implementation of a theft at Moscow cinema on the 10th of January, 2010, declared at the First Instance Court of Kentron and Nork-Marash administrative districts that coercive methods were used towards him to make him confess. Civil Society Institute NGO made a statement on this occasion urging the authorities to make an investigation of torture and not use illegally obtained evidence as the bases of charges.  

Another case of torture and degrading treatment took place in May 2009 in Katnaghbyur village of Aragatsotn region against Sasha Davtyan who was charged with raping his daughter. The victim of the case and her sister also were subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment at RA Central Police Department over four days.

On the 17th of December 2009, the Fist Instance Court of Aragatsotn region declared Sasha Davtyan innocent for raping his daughter. However, no investigation was made in regard of torture, about which there were statements at the court hearings and nobody is held liable for it.


[1] United Nations Organization Analysis of Implementation of UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by Courts, 2008 [«Խոշտանգումների և դաժան, անմարդկային կամ արժանապատվությունը նվաստացնող վերաբերմունքի ու պատժի այլ ձևերի դեմ ՄԱԿ-ի կոնվենցիայի կիրառումը դատարանների կողմից» վերլուծություն, ՄԱԿ, 2008թ]

[2] Idib, pg.12

  • UN Committee against Torture to examine Armenia's record on torture

    10.05.2012 | News
    Geneva, May 9: On May 10 and 11 Armenia's torture record is up for review by the UN Committee against Torture. A report submitted to the UN monitoring body by FIDH andCivil Society Institute (CSI), its member organization in Armenia, highlights threefailures of the state with regard to torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishments: failure to properly criminalize torture, failure to prevent it in police facilities or detention centers, and failure to hold accountable those responsible. The report provides the Committee with information on both the legal system and state practice in the country, illustrated by concrete cases that cover awide range of torture practices.

  • The court uphold the decision on detention

    28.03.2012 | Point of View
    The judge Mkhitar Papoyan rejected the petition of advocates for the second time to release Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Qerobyan mentioning they are accused of a grave crime. He did not take into account the fact that the grounds on which the two men were arrested 2 years ago are not relevant today. The relatives were ready to give a bail, Hovakimyan’s father was ready to put the only real estate they have their apartment in pledge. The court did not take into account the petition of more than 20 intellectuals by which they ensure Stepan Hovakimyan’s proper behavior. The court made a decision to uphold the decision on arrest taking as a principle the degree of danger of the crime.

  • A criminal case with a whole “bunch” of human rights violations

    26.03.2012 | Point of View
    Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahram Qerobyan, who were charged for theft from “Moscow” cinema, are under detention for more than 2 years. There is no evidence proving their guilt. The only ground is the confession of Stepan Hovakimyan, which he claims to have written because of battery and torture. On March 26 “Civil Society Institute” (CSI) NGO held a press conference demanding to change the preventive measures of Hovakimyan and Qerobyan and to conduct a comprehensive and unbiased investigation on the fact of torture of Hovakimyan.

  • FIDH and the Civil Society Institute Demand Fair Trial in the Stepan Hovakimyan and Vahrma Qerobyan Case

    23.02.2012 | News
    Two years have passed since Stepan Hovakimyan was charged on 6 February 2010 with organizing and committing theft at the "Moskva" cinema house on 10 January 2010. FIDH and the Civil Society Institute call upon the Armenian authorities to: immediately release S.Hovakimyan and V. Kerobyan on bail; conduct an independent, effective and thorough investigation into the torture allegations to identify the perpetrators and bring them to justice.

  • The fact of torture of Hovakimyan will be proved by the witnesses

    15.12.2011 | News
    For proving the fact that Stepan Hovakimyan was subjected to torture, witnesses will be interrogated. After suspending the trials for this case for several times the RA Court of Criminal Appeals satisfied the lawyer’s motion to interrogate the witnesses during the next court trial, who prove that the fact of torture took place.

  • Next